Archive for October, 2009
MX 3.1.18
The biggest performance gains that we experienced were directly attributable to upgrade of Java from 1.4 to 6. However check that that you don’t have any problems with regressions (we had small issues around that aspect). On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 14:11, Daniel Sobrado wrote: > Yes, we are using 3.1.18.3, there are some [...]
MX 3.1.18
Yes, we are using 3.1.18.3, there are some changes, licenses, INSTALL/INSTALL procedure, some MxMLEx improvements… On 10/15/09, ^_^ wrote: > > Hi All > > I’m a newcomer here. I’m working for an I-bank that use Murex a lot. > > Doesn’t anyone already upgrade to MX 3.1.18? what’s the performance > gain/loss? > > [...]
MX 3.1.18
Hi All I’m a newcomer here. I’m working for an I-bank that use Murex a lot. Doesn’t anyone already upgrade to MX 3.1.18? what’s the performance gain/loss? Cheers, Romeo — This message was sent to the Murex User Group at murex-l@listserv.linke.de – To join the group visit http://www.murexusers.org/join-us – If you wish to leave the [...]
Murex on Sybase ASE 12.x
Hi Mohan what version of murex are you running? in the most recent binary release for 2.11.x (x being greater than 38), murex has suggested upgrades to java 1.6 and the version of sybase was 15.0.x. it would be better to contact your murex support. regards On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Mohan [...]
Murex on Sybase ASE 12.x
Hello, I have heard that Murex has an agreement with Sybase… such that Sybase continues to support Murex installations on Sybase ASE 12.x engine. And this is regardless of the fact that Sybase ASE 12.x enters a End-of-Life status in Dec 2009. Can someone advise if this is true? and if this is true… could [...]
[full-time] Contract and Permanent Positions at Maltem Asia
Location: SingaporeDescription: Maltem Asia is hiring immediately senior Murex consultants on a contract or permanent basis. We have urgent and immediate requirements for: – Front Office Business Analysts – Risk Management Business Analysts – Reporting and MxML Developers – Back Office Developers In principel we are interested in talking to anyone who has 5+ years [...]
consistency rule 2.11.39
You can introduce these checks in your contract workflow, something like a speedbump exception where when a trade beyond a certain notional is created then it has to pass through extra pair of eye. ________________________________ From: Murex User Group [mailto:MUREX-L@LISTSERV.LINKE.DE] On Behalf Of marina roncalli Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:19 AM To: MUREX-L@LISTSERV.LINKE.DE Subject: [...]
R: [MUREX-L] consistency rule 2.11.39
Hi Marina,   I have some idea regarding Consistancy rule. I think it will help you.  Consistency rule has the features that can be assign to User Defined Fields in order to force the specific behavior in the System or of the user in certain conditions. Consistency rules are assigned to user-defined fields [...]
Next Meetings in Singapore (15.10.2009), Frankfurt (8.10.2009) and London (7.10.2009)
Dear all, Just a quick reminder about the upcoming events in London, Frankfurt and Singapore. Please register as soon as you can so that we can book the places accordingly. Here are the registration links: https://www.regonline.com/murex_user_group_social_meeting_fall_2009_lond on https://www.regonline.com/mug_social_meeting_fall_2009_frankfurt https://www.regonline.com/mug_social_meeting_fall_2009_singapore Thanks, Markus — This message was sent to the Murex User Group at murex-l@listserv.linke.de – To [...]
R: [MUREX-L] consistency rule 2.11.39
Hi Marina, If you have MLC module you can configure a simple risk to do it. Otherwise you create a mandatory UDF and associate a rule to it; the rule will check the content of the notional amount and pop up a message. Cordiali saluti/Best Regards, Giovanni Violante. P Please consider the environment. Print this [...]
Recent Comments
- of mesothelioma on New Murex User Group-website live!
- admin on Private: Murex Flex Developer wanted
Most Emailed
